Cloud World

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 25 November 2013

Compute Engine Load Balancing hits 1 million requests per second!

Posted on 11:21 by Unknown
The C10k problem is so last century. How about serving 1 million load balanced requests per second in the cloud? Using publicly available Google Cloud Platform services, including Google Compute Load Balancing, we have done exactly that. Within 5 seconds after the setup and without any pre-warming, our load balancer was able to serve 1 million requests per second and sustain that level.



This number is 20 times greater than the throughput in last year’s Eurovision Song Contest, which served 125 million users in Europe and was hosted on Google Compute Engine. The Eurovision setup used DNS load balancing, which increases the complexity of setup, maintenance and cost. We were able to simplify this process using Compute Engine Load Balancing, which avoids these issues by providing simple APIs and allowing a single IP address to serve all traffic at a lower cost than do-it-yourself options. In addition, Compute Engine Load Balancing has the ability to detect unhealthy instances and dynamically add and remove new instances to serve traffic. This addresses the hard-to-solve problem of cached DNS entries in end-user browsers. No more “404’s”.





Starting with an empty Compute Engine project and ending with 456 cores provisioned (for the load generator and web servers VMs) and one load-balanced IP address actively processing 1.016M Requests Per Second (+-0.007M) took a total of 7 minutes 30 seconds. The 1M number is measuring a complete request and successful response. You can read more on how to set up the Compute Engine Load Balancing and how to provision Compute Engine VMs on the Google Cloud Platform website.



The following depicts the setup used:







This setup demonstrated a couple of features, including scaling of the Compute Engine Load Balancing, use of different machine types and rapid provisioning. For generating the load we used 64 n1-standard-4’s running curl_loader with 16 threads and 1000 connections. Each curl_loader ran the same config to generate roughly the same number of requests to the LB. The load was directed at a single IP address, which then fanned out to the web servers.



To demonstrate scaling of the Compute Engine Load Balancing fanout we used 200 n1-standard-1’s Web Server running Apache v2.2.22 on Debian 7.1 Wheezy Images. Users are encouraged to use larger VM types for better single machine backend web serving, however here we demonstrated the scaling of the load balancer to backends and were not concerned with the backends themselves using every cycle to serve responses. Each backend web server received ~5K requests per second, which is an even distribution.



Compute Engine Load Balancing distributed the load by using a tuple of source address+port, destination address+port and protocol. Each web response was 1 byte in size not including the http headers. All of this was configured from an empty Compute Engine project. To reproduce the data yourself you can use the following Gist.



This entire setup and test cost just $10 USD!



-Posted by, Anthony F. Voellm, Performance Engineering Manager
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • SaltStack for Google Compute Engine
    SaltStack was built for the performance, reliability, security and scale delivered by Google Compute Engine . Needless to say we are very e...
  • 2013 Year in review: making Google Compute Engine Generally Available
    2013 was a busy year for Google Cloud Platform. Watch this space: each day, a different Googler who works on Cloud Platform will be sharing ...
  • Why We Deployed Zencoder on Google Cloud Platform
    Today's guest post comes from Jon Dahl, VP of Encoding Services at Brightcove. Brightcove’s Zencoder transcodes millions of video and au...
  • Google Compute Engine and App Engine give Evite freedom to expand services anytime
    Today’s guest blog comes from Dan Mesh, Vice President of Technology at Evite, the pioneer in online invitations and social planning. Evite ...
  • International Offline Disk Import now available with new disk-upload centers in Japan, India and Switzerland
    Google Cloud Platform customers have told us that transferring large data sets (in the hundreds of terabytes and beyond) can be expensive a...
  • Google Compute Engine is now Generally Available with expanded OS support, transparent maintenance, and lower prices
    Google Cloud Platform gives developers the flexibility to architect applications with both managed and unmanaged services that run on Googl...
  • 2013 Year in review: bringing App Engine to the PHP community
    2013 was a busy year for Google Cloud Platform. Watch this space: each day, a different Googler who works on Cloud Platform will be sharing ...
  • 2013 Year in review: giving time back to developers
    2013 was a busy year for Google Cloud Platform. Watch this space: each day, a different Googler who works on Cloud Platform will be sharing ...
  • Update on Datastore Auto IDs
    In the upcoming Google App Engine 1.8.1 release, the  Datastore default auto ID policy in production will switch to scattered IDs to impro...
  • DataStax Enterprise feels right at home in Google Compute Engine
    Today’s guest post comes from Martin Van Ryswyk, Vice President of Engineering at DataStax. The cloud promises many things for database user...

Categories

  • 1.1.2
  • agile
  • android
  • Announcements
  • api
  • app engine
  • appengine
  • batch
  • bicycle
  • bigquery
  • canoe
  • casestudy
  • cloud
  • Cloud Datastore
  • cloud endpoints
  • cloud sql
  • cloud storage
  • cloud-storage
  • community
  • Compute Engine
  • conferences
  • customer
  • datastore
  • delete
  • developer days
  • developer-insights
  • devfests
  • django
  • email
  • entity group
  • events
  • getting started
  • google
  • googlenew
  • gps
  • green
  • Guest Blog
  • hadoop
  • html5
  • index
  • io2010
  • IO2013
  • java
  • kaazing
  • location
  • mapreduce
  • norex
  • open source
  • partner
  • payment
  • paypal
  • pipeline
  • put
  • python
  • rental
  • research project
  • solutions
  • support
  • sustainability
  • taskqueue
  • technical
  • toolkit
  • twilio
  • video
  • websockets
  • workflows

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (143)
    • ►  December (33)
    • ▼  November (15)
      • Compute Engine Load Balancing hits 1 million reque...
      • Dedicated memcache is now generally available in A...
      • Development tips for Google Cloud Endpoints for An...
      • Offline Disk Import and the OmNomNom Machine
      • International Offline Disk Import now available wi...
      • Google App Engine integration features in IntelliJ...
      • Connecting mobile developers to the cloud with Goo...
      • Rovio, Freshplanet, Pocket Gems and others talk ab...
      • Build amazing real time games on Google Cloud Plat...
      • Just Develop IT Migrates Petabytes of Data to Goog...
      • App Engine 1.8.7 and a platform that is great for ...
      • Google App Engine helps MAG Interactive handle exp...
      • Applibot builds social games on Google Cloud Platform
      • How to build scalable mobile games on Google Cloud...
      • Kaplan builds online education platform KAPx with ...
    • ►  October (17)
    • ►  September (13)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (15)
    • ►  June (12)
    • ►  May (15)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2012 (43)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (8)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2011 (46)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (8)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2010 (38)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (5)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (5)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2009 (47)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2008 (46)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (10)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (7)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile